DNA pioneer says white people are smarter than black people

Mikey 149 comments
  • Science
DNA pioneer says white people are smarter than black people

The scientist who won the 1962 Nobel Prize for his work on discovering the structure of DNA has had his upcoming talk cancelled by the Science Museum.

Dr James Watson's controversial views on intelligence state that white people are smarter than black people. A museum spokesperson said "It is a shame that a man with a record of scientific distinction should see his work overshadowed by his own irrational prejudices."

In a recent interview, Watson said:

"...all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really."

He also said that he hoped everyone was equal but "people who have to deal with black employees find this is not true."

No stranger to controversy, Watson is on record as once stating that a woman should have the right to abortion if it can be proved the unborn child is going to be a homosexual.

Not a Member!

Jake

Friday 19th October 2007 | 10:05 AM

I love it... what an old school racist, homophobic, bigot xenophobic hillarious nut.

Luky we have the evangelical christians to take over from this man's generation. I don't think I'd want to live in a world without opression, afterall, how would we know how terrible we are if we aren't told so?

Not a Member!

Gilly

Friday 19th October 2007 | 05:53 PM

and Mike called me a Troll. Weak Mike and weak Jake.

Not a Member!

Rodney

Friday 19th October 2007 | 06:14 PM

Sorry Gilly, I missed a lot of stuff lately while away - what are you on about?

Not a Member!

Mikey

Friday 19th October 2007 | 08:08 PM

@ Gilly: ??? What did I say?

Not a Member!

Alter Ego

Saturday 20th October 2007 | 02:11 AM

Interesting...

Although I agree it is not politically correct to say things like this, whatever happened to freedom of speech?

He is not the first person to draw this conclusion, why must we dismiss it straight away?

I have read more on what he said and I think it could be possible, since there is supposed to be a "intelligence gene" and based on the fact that (as he says) black and white people evolved in different geographical locations over many thousands of years, why should we think that black people will be of equal intelligence when in evolution, white people were the more intelligent.

I think it is a shame that just because someone has stated something that could very well be proven to be true, we hound them and call them a racist!

Pathetic if you ask me.

Not a Member!

Gilly

Saturday 20th October 2007 | 11:31 AM

Oh, Cmon Mike- Jakes your little attack dog. Throw him a biscuit. Rub his nose.
If I was to say anything like that you would sook.
Pathetic baseless comment Jake. Typical.

Not a Member!

Mikey

Saturday 20th October 2007 | 12:35 PM

@ Gilly: I haven't read any of the comments yet, but looking at Jake's comment now, I am guessing you are referring too "Luky we have the evangelical christians to take over from this man's generation"

That's pretty tame, and I would let that slide from anyone. It wasn't a spiteful attack directed at any individual, which is where I draw the line.

You are free to say the same thing about another religion because it was just a generalisation, and as we all know generalisations don't fly anyway.

Not a Member!

Gilly

Sunday 21st October 2007 | 10:10 PM

It was the fundamental/evangelical Christians, Jake, who ended slavery. All men are created equal. Are you a retard, or are you stupid by choice Jake?
Mike I reckon my comments were tame. You cried and blocked me like a coward. If you want me gone , just ask, right here right now?

Not a Member!

Mikey

Sunday 21st October 2007 | 10:55 PM

Sigh...

Not a Member!

Jake

Monday 22nd October 2007 | 10:36 AM

I like to think I'm a little of both Gillmeister. What is your excuse?

I think you'll find very few people here that don't get some enjoyment out of your posts, they are often inflamatory and entertaining all at the same time. I'd love to sit down and have a coffee with you one day, and talk about cars or pollitics, I'm starting to think that debating religion is 98% of your identity... mind you one could give the same argument about me.

Alter Ego, you raise a very valid point, I often think that pollitical correctedness goes as far as to censor usefull argument. You raise another valid point about the bilinear evolution of black and white people, though mental capacity is hardly something that can be generalised to include an entire race and is hardly a DNA supported argument.

If such a gap were to imerge through research, I would speculate that the differences would be the cause of a lack of access to adequate and equal education.

Not a Member!

Gilly

Monday 22nd October 2007 | 12:51 PM

Jake, what has this got to do with Fundamental Christianity. Debating Religion is 98% of what I do here as there is a clear hatred of Christianity. This has been taken way off topic.
Yeah Mike *sigh*, what I dont get is, you dont mind the attack by Jake. Though it has no relevance to the story.
Why the attack?
Whats the connection?

Dr James Watson Agnosticism / Atheism
Explain that Jake?

Not a Member!

Peter

Wednesday 24th October 2007 | 10:54 AM

I think that anyone who believes in the bible, shouldn't even entertain the thought of this idiots book. It's descriminative and derogatory. It makes me sick.

Not a Member!

Jake

Thursday 25th October 2007 | 10:19 AM

Sorry Peter, are you saying that if you believe in the bible, you should ignore all scientific progress made towards medical science?

Being able to understand DNA is vital for determining and fighting hereditary disease, and disease caused by radiation, i.e. cancer, leukemia, melanoma etc.

Not a Member!

Ay

Friday 26th October 2007 | 04:43 PM

After all this years, its reality to say we are on the same spot in . Like Tupacc said" some things will never change"

Not a Member!

NC

Monday 29th October 2007 | 05:42 AM

To Alter Ego:

In reference to the so call Intelligence gene, while I am sure there is a stupid gene and I think would definitely apply to you and Dr. Watson and I thank you for allow me to use my Freedom of speech... one more thing. Do you also think this is pathetic as well....

Not a Member!

lea

Monday 29th October 2007 | 03:50 PM

Actually...
I'm not sure that your genes have anything to do with it.

I'm a debt collector and I talk to uneducated people all day long... both white and black. I think it has more to do with ones current environment. If you have access to information. And if you chose to be an educated person.

Plus, I definatly belive that there is an IQ gene but, IQ refers to how much information you can store.

I think its dumb to say that there is a stupid gene. everyones born knowing the same thing... nothing.

Not a Member!

Mikey

Monday 29th October 2007 | 04:53 PM

I think there is a stupid gene, and I am going to call it the 'Anthony Anderson gene' in honour of one of society's dumbest.

https://rustylime.com/show_article.php?id=940

Not a Member!

Jaco

Sunday 18th May 2008 | 03:28 AM

Ok, its easy to say his a nut and his homophobic. etc etc.

But what if you looked at the facts, before we go calling people names, and see that what he says is true? Its easy to climb on the political band wagon and call him someone a racist, but what if someone else also can proof this? What then? Will they also be called a racist?

Scientist


Not a Member!

Marie Ellena Jacobs

Friday 6th June 2008 | 09:51 AM


To bad he does not want to spread the truth .. believe me when I tell you.





case closed... for now :)

Not a Member!

marie ellena jacobs

Friday 6th June 2008 | 09:53 AM

it's a cover up.. and I'm not black... I'm a whitey :)

Not a Member!

marie ellena jacobs

Friday 6th June 2008 | 09:53 AM

it's a cover up.. and I'm not black... I'm a whitey :)

Not a Member!

African prophet

Sunday 22nd June 2008 | 01:36 AM

fuck all crackers yall aint got no melanin

Not a Member!

BBC

Sunday 22nd June 2008 | 01:48 AM

African americans are the prime target in white america. And are able to go on with their lives with hatred around them. White people try to be dominant they have to be in control of everything but their plan doesn't follow through properly. The world was created by god and society began when the egyptians begin the create economy by creating ways of living. the first letters or words were created by egyptians which were black. The pyramids were build by the egyptians who were enslaved who were black.of course because egyprt is in africa which they to tried to hide from blacks. blacks are tyhe creators of many things we were not given credit for. most Herbalist were african american creating medicine and cures for our people. Most famous mathematicians were black also the first man to Imhotep and his queen Nefertiti .Nefertiti may have also ruled as pharaoh in her own right under the name Neferneferuaten briefly after her husband's death and before the accession of Tutankhamun, although this identification is called into doubt by the latest research.She was made famous by her bust, now in Berlin's Altes Museum, shown to the right. The bust is one of the most copied works of ancient Egypt. It was attributed to the sculptor Thutmose, and was found in his workshop. Whites really and truly envy africans but sorry for yall bitch asses

Not a Member!

Gina Squitieri

Sunday 22nd June 2008 | 07:18 AM

Well anyone as ugly as he is has no other option but to claim intellectual superiority. :D

Not a Member!

GodsHand

Thursday 18th September 2008 | 06:49 AM

...in response to this comment by Peter. So thats why all somewhat dark people seem dull, i thought it was just a reflection. I'll watch my words around coloured folk since i know now it's in there DNA, they cant handle honesty and discussion. Peoples reactions prove it, three cookies for the WHITE scientist.

Not a Member!

ron

Monday 10th November 2008 | 01:21 PM

he's a scientist. why is what he said racist? get a life and stop being irrational little bitches...

Not a Member!

Jake

Monday 10th November 2008 | 02:48 PM

...in response to this comment by ron. He made the white supremacist claim that non-white people are inherrantly inferior to white. This is not the case. You can not tout one's own life experience as 'scientific fact' as this man was purported to have done.

Not a Member!

snake the midgets

Thursday 25th December 2008 | 10:41 AM

All me are created equal...
that is true in respect to equality in front of God.
however intellectually... none of us are the same when we are born..
i don't think skin color makes the difference but i think how often one practices his intellect makes you smart/stupid.

however if that man can give a proof that can be tested and tried over and over then maybe he is right... however this doesn't make any white man smarter than any black man.

maybe if you can compare the smartest black man and the smartest white man.. the white man may win (one of them has to be smarter anyway) but i know shitloads of black men that are way more intelligent than most white men i know

Not a Member!

Jake

Saturday 7th February 2009 | 01:29 PM

WHITE POWER.

Not a Member!

August

Friday 13th February 2009 | 06:26 AM

Bigots wearing white coats don't make their beliefs legitimate. This guy would feel at home in the 17th century.

Not a Member!

bob

Thursday 26th March 2009 | 02:59 PM

cooool

Not a Member!

michael jackson

Thursday 26th March 2009 | 03:00 PM

achoo

Not a Member!

Ian

Thursday 23rd April 2009 | 07:09 AM

Its probably true, and to be honest since the 1950's people are coming back around to the idea that Black people might not work in society like whites.... People are afraid to embrace the truth because of its inherent implications. I mean what would we do if it was proven that African is a mess because Blacks can't handle western political ideals and financial systems. What would it do for African-Americans trying to get into university? Is it possible that African-Americans with fairer complexions that have European ancestry as well are smarter that the truly black Africans? What would that mean? Darwin's concept of Survival of the Fittest clearly explains how and why African was so easily invaded and placed into slavery... doesn't that in of it self mean that sub-Saharan Africans are less intelligent?

Is this world capable of the truth without leading to something awful like Eugenics......

If we all evolved from lesser humanoids why is it so hard to believe that not all of us grew up the same. Whites moved North where it was cold and innovation was key, Asians crossed seas to get to Australia and Micronesia- technology streamed out of the Orient. The Arabs found Mohammad and built the foundations of modern life throughout Europe and the middle east with vast trade routes, libraries and Egypt... and sub-Saharan Africans---- they made mud huts....

Not a Member!

the A

Saturday 2nd May 2009 | 02:27 AM

...in response to this comment by lea. All debt collectors have a special place reserved for them in hell. And I don't even believe in hell.

Not a Member!

Its Spiderman, Duh

Saturday 2nd May 2009 | 06:55 AM

...in response to this comment by michael jackson. So you would be inferring by that comment that evolution has given white people supremacy over blacks, also, he is a Noble prize winning scientist so he cant be completely dismissed, can he?
Would it then be acceptable, if blacks are indeed less evolved than whites? That we should consider cleansing the gene pool, seriously why not? Just give evolution a little push
Who else wont make the grade, Pygmies (like little black oompa loompahs) Jews, they are a little different. Eskimos and Australian Aboriginals (a didgirie doo is not an instrument, no matter what you think, its a big straw)
After reading gillys comments maybe even Christian fundys, (just the black ones?)
or
Maybe we should just line up all the scientists, clearly they are the most stupid people on Earth and bust a cap in to there heads.

Not a Member!

Peter Fennelsdorf

Tuesday 5th May 2009 | 04:35 AM

I knew dem niggers were dumber!!!!

Not a Member!

jerome

Sunday 14th June 2009 | 01:50 PM

...in response to this comment by Jake. i ask... why, suddenly, is his word not as valued? everyone knows he is correct. why do we pretend?

Not a Member!

donny ike

Tuesday 23rd June 2009 | 01:03 AM

I think that science can be revelant of revealing the higher levels of intellegence in certain species.

It sounds reasonalble to abort a homosexual on the account that they shall not bear you grandchildren. Therefore all the resources pouring into the gay child would be pointless given that they shall not pass on your offspring.

Not a Member!

josh

Thursday 25th June 2009 | 09:43 PM

...in response to this comment by donny ike. I'm unimpressed to be honest.
This douche has had a history of being an immoral douche.
He stole his nobel prize- in a manner of speaking.

Not a Member!

Dan

Tuesday 21st July 2009 | 12:34 PM

Josh are you insane? Prove anything other than your unreasonably misguided ideals. Don't you realize that morality is not cold hard facts, it may coincide, but it is not the same. Scientists want the facts. Why are only nations where white people live having MASSIVE influxes of immigrants and intermarriage? Is it because their nations are inferior?

Mario

Mario

Wednesday 22nd July 2009 | 06:37 AM
20 total kudos

I don't understand the whole idea that whites are smarter than anyone. European whites derived their knowledge after centuries of known civilizations existed in Africa, the Middle East and Asia. How does that make them smarter? Is it because we're in the West? The recent decline of the European empires? The fact technology expansion shot off after industrialism in the predominantly rich and white nations?

Of course DNA evolves differently in different regions, but the human brain has grown to sufficient size to be conditioned in many ways. Besides, there are accounts of selective breeding for many slaves where the strongest and not necessarily the smartest was preferred for trade.

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Not a Member!

vanikaapaf

Monday 17th August 2009 | 09:36 PM

Its sad to see that people are still arguing about same stupid thing, yes the Europeans had be more innovative, it made them more intelligent in field but the intelligence of that african in his field can not be ignored, as their meds. help and safed alot of the so called more intelligent whities.

Intelligence is not only the inventing of new technology but also the living in hamony with the earth its creatures and also its very full of itself creature man, those so called unintelligent people called the khoi or the san were far superia than any of you people you'll probaly wont survive a day in their shoes.

And has far as believing that black people are less intelligent please explain george bush

Not a Member!

steven

Friday 25th September 2009 | 12:48 PM

The fact that this is being debated with such passion and anger simple serves to prove one point. You are all racists. This article is clearly biased. That being said, I would also like to point out that it's a horrible shame that this purely scientific theory can't be discussed rationally.

Jake Farr-Wharton

Jake Farr-Wharton

Friday 25th September 2009 | 01:36 PM
202 total kudos

...in response to this comment by steven. Hi Steven, this theory wasn't actually scientifically derrived, thus it can not be discussed as scientific theory.

On another hand, today a study was released that suggest smacking children gives them a lower IQ.

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
dobbo996

dobbo996

Saturday 26th September 2009 | 04:45 PM
3 total kudos

I'm smarter than my cat and he's black.

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Not a Member!

Cactus

Monday 28th September 2009 | 05:58 PM


.all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the TESTING says not really."
That is the Watson quote, isnt it?
Did the good Scientist use the word TESTING?
Maybe I am bieng led to believe TESTING means scientific TESTING?
I am confused. So there was no testing?
A scientist lying to justify his beliefs, NO? I wont believe that. The word testing was used.
So the theory according to Jake, with no verifications from anybody is "this theory wasn't actually scientifically derrived, thus it can not be discussed as scientific theory."
But still that word testing bothers me from the original quote.
Why is it so readily dismissed. Watson is a good scientist with a Nobel prize and distinctions
and
Oh Jake Jake Jake
"a study was released that suggest smacking children gives them a lower IQ"
Try this one mate, my theory (its not really, its common sense)
Children with a lower IQ are generally naughtier, hence they get punished more

You know what I think. There are some stupid stupid scientists out there and even more stupid people who believe them.
just the opinion of a bridge dwelling troll

Jake Farr-Wharton

Jake Farr-Wharton

Tuesday 29th September 2009 | 09:33 AM
202 total kudos

...in response to this comment by Cactus. Cactus, I firstly want to give you a high 5 for actually contributing to the discussion, I thouroughly enjoyed your discussion and I agree with you to a certain extent; I think that people are all too quick to make a suggestion, then use selective facts to back it up.

The fact is that black kids don't have anywhere near the same access to education and extra curricular support as white kids do. Sure there are plenty of cases where wealthy black kids excell, and where black kids work their ass off and achieve against all odds, but in the main, you're far more likely to achieve if you're white, because of your access to quality education and support when you slip through the cracks.

If black kids are low achievers, it is because of the education gap, not because of some genetic intelligence gap.

Also, children with ADD and AD/HD are often kids with exceptionally high IQs. These are kids that often act up the most, are the naughtiest and worst behaved, but are certainly not the ones with the lowest IQ.

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Not a Member!

Cactus

Wednesday 30th September 2009 | 06:40 PM

"Cactus, I firstly want to give you a high 5 for actually contributing to the discussion, I thouroughly enjoyed your discussion and I agree with you to a certain extent; I think that people are all too quick to make a suggestion, then use selective facts to back it up."

Now its just for me to wait on an intelligent contribution from you. HMMM
Shakes his head, not expecting anything

I read Gillys comments further up. And you have the gall to call anybody else a troll.
Jake wake up to yourself.
Read your own posts, do you actualy respect yourself. Do you like that person in the mirror.
I dont want your hi 5 or a slap on the back.

Jimmy Watson is a very dangerous arrogant man, so are you. You both preach bigotry, and you both use education as an excuse. Read your own posts

I am happy to be your private little troll, you sad sad man

Jake Farr-Wharton

Jake Farr-Wharton

Thursday 1st October 2009 | 07:15 AM
202 total kudos

...in response to this comment by Cactus. Good to know I have a loyal fan Cactus-moractus... how lucky am I?

I'd like to thank the academny, and all my fellow bigots who were nominated for this honour, but most especially, I'd like to thank the Hindu God of Destruction, Shiva, for her unrelenting waves of inspiration; the Thai God THAILEXENG for being the greatest combination of gods (THAILEXENG is the god of War and Tuesdays) and lastly; I'd like to thank the Judeo-Christian God, whom I shall name Bill Inviso for being conveniently abscent in every facet of the universe except the supposedly holy texts, yet being a beacon of hope to the billions who read said supposedly holy texts.

Cactus, while I know you'd love to be the stearing wheel in my pants that drives`me nuts, as a Christian, I can't hate you, but you are going to hell.

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Not a Member!

bob

Monday 26th October 2009 | 07:58 PM

...in response to this comment by BBC. I'm white and don't as a rule get involved in this my dads bigger than your dad crap but has on tv a lot and had a read of some comments above to start Egypt not black more arab colour if u want to no what black people look like try ghana south africa etc there black as for who is smarter well doesn't affect my life either way but i am angry that its ok to say black people are as a race stronger and more/better athletic that white people why is that ok and not racist (this does not make white inferior just different) why can't the white have some genetic whatever that makes us as a race more intelligent as a counter balance (this would not make black inferior just different) to the above or was more out of need moving into a more hostile and unforging environment become more intelligent and live stay the same and die but I forget white race can't be better in any way and if u think we r then your racist scum but the white can be inferior in some way that is ok and good not racist in anyway now I think this would be a more interesting debate than than the my dads bigger one

Not a Member!

cambo

Monday 16th November 2009 | 11:52 PM

So, are blacks smarter than whites? Would that make everybody happy? Blacks spawned all sub species we have today and yes, some whites developed the brain cells more than their negroid counterparts as we have seen in inventions of electricity, industrial revolution, tv, telephone, internet, plane, car, computer and the list goes on. White man knows how to think outside of the box, something that the black didn't have to do in Africa with warm weather and abundance of food. Whites (albinos) were otcasted from black villages only to go on to be smarter, whilst blacks still go on being bettter at athletic stuff. In hundreds of thousands of years, when the sun is going to burn out or some other tragic event is going to take place threatening the survival of mankind, who will everyone look to?

Not a Member!

cambo

Monday 16th November 2009 | 11:58 PM

Quite ironic when you think about it. The negroids outcasted the albinos - the inferior, who then set off, evolved into a smarter human and then came back and turned the once oppressors into slaves. A classic tale of getting bitten in the butt.

Not a Member!

The-Libertarian

Friday 27th November 2009 | 11:23 PM

Sometimes you just have to face facts.

Think about everything good in the world. Everything good from Democracy to the Internet was invented by a white man. Space travel? ditto. Automobiles? ditto. The corporation? ditto. Television? ditto.

Its a pretty amazing thing that a race which makes up only about 20% of the world's population has also contribued 95% of the accomplishments.

Be proud of who you are.

Not a Member!

a proud beautiful white woman

Saturday 28th November 2009 | 08:53 AM

...in response to this comment by BBC. obviously a black woman wrote this. the lowest of all. do you actually think we are envious of black people? we know obama and michelle are in the white house but every day they have to look in the mirror and guess what they see? they are still black.

I was raised color blind. It wasnt until I had 3 black women work with me when I realized the facts. they were lazy. wanted everyone else to do the work. you couldnt get them to do anything. they had children at 15 and were grandparents at 32. nice...

i agree with everything these scientists have to say. and in 2010 we will turn this mistake around. the white people are no longer feeling guilty for a 150 yr old mistake. we never should have brought those people over from the jungle they lived in... our bad..

as for asians - you are tremendously smart and will kick our ass in the next century.. educated and smart... (and not asking for welfare or free healthcare, or redistribution of wealth like black people do.. again - lazy)

Mikey

Mikey

Saturday 28th November 2009 | 10:27 AM
235 total kudos | 1 for this comment

...in response to this comment by a proud beautiful white woman. Wow - we get all types here, but you could be the very first white supremacist to comment on this site.

You don't think you're generalising a bit? I've met plenty of lazy white people, but I'd be stupid to say all whites are lazy. I also once knew an Asian guy who was probably the laziest person I've met in my entire life. If I knew 2 more lazy Asians, could I say all Asian's are lazy in the same way you say all Black people are lazy?

I've worked hard and am a well respected veteran in my chosen field of web development. Just for kicks in my spare time I compose music and program. Together with my partner, who was born of Burmese parents, we are raising two awesome girls. Life is pretty fricking fantastic.

I'm also the son of a white woman who gave birth to me when she was just 16, and my father (of German descent) 19 at the time. But what has any of that got to do with anything?

I'd say your black female work mates were just plain lazy, not lazy because they were black.

And I'd add that your views on race and culture are as primitive as the back-woods yokel-esque education you probably received at the closed fist of your redneck parents. Frankly I'm amazed you were able to compose a comment.

How's life working out for you so far?

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Not a Member!

V2

Saturday 28th November 2009 | 12:26 PM

Cmon Mike
Dr James Watson Agnostic / Atheist, is a Nobel Prize winning scientist.
Far more well respected in his field than you are. Seems to even support Darwinism (I can link it)

The Libertarian and Beautiful (on the outside I would guess) White Woman are only voicing an opinion based on experience


"And I'd add that your views on race and culture are as primitive as the back-woods yokel-esque education you probably received at the closed fist of your redneck parents. Frankly I'm amazed you were able to compose a comment."
But Hey Mikey you would be above generalisations, Right?

Mikey

Mikey

Saturday 28th November 2009 | 01:08 PM
235 total kudos

...in response to this comment by V2. I think, that when an opinion is really just racial hatred in disguise, it warrants some feedback.

I'm not at all trying to discredit Watson's work because I'm no scientist and I don't know enough about what he does.

"The Libertarian and Beautiful (on the outside I would guess) White Woman are only voicing an opinion based on experience"

Yes they are, but you don't have to have half a brain to know that because you've had a bad experience with a certain culture or race, that doesn't mean all people from said culture or race are the same. That's just...well that's just plain ignorance, a common trait among white supremacists. "I've met a few lazy black people, therefore all black people are lazy". Seriously? If you can help explain the logic behind that, I'd love to read about it.

As you probably already know, life isn't quite like that, except for close minded fools - but try explaining it to them :-)

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Not a Member!

V2

Saturday 28th November 2009 | 04:30 PM



"And I'd add that your views on race and culture are as primitive as the back-woods yokel-esque education you probably received at the closed fist of your redneck parents. Frankly I'm amazed you were able to compose a comment."

But Hey Mikey you would be above generalisations, Right?

Generalisations heh
I am guessing you dont think The Libertarian and Beautiful (on the outside I would guess) White Woman are Nobel prize winners then

Not a Member!

"lightskin" Black

Sunday 29th November 2009 | 07:44 PM

All that the white man has come to know as knowledge has been stolen. The white man has survived in this world with his parasite type behavior, sucking knowledge and resources such as gold, oil and diamonds from other countries. Wherever the white man has been, he has colonized or left destruction in his wake, it is not that white people are smarter (as I know many white people who are extremely stupid, all you have to do is look at the binge culture in England, binge culture is a white thing), it's simply that they are more EVIL.........Black people in a general sense are a nation of people who are trusting and loving, as we are nearer to God, the white man's mind in a general sense is more manipulative, cold and unfeeling, a white man will not do anything unless he benefits from it.

We have been led to believe that Science is the reality, when in all honesty, science is the mask, that disguises the truth, and brainwashes us to believe madness, such as the black race being less intelligent than the white race. Moreover, how could the fact that our skin has more melanin and pigmentation have anything to do with the make up of our brains??? You guys are all lost..........

Not a Member!

explor

Wednesday 2nd December 2009 | 04:52 PM

there is evidence for the bases of this mans statment just because some ppl ar to pc o explore it should not make the rest of us racisits to doing so. Consider that man started in Africa therfore the first man was black, then some of thoses black wandered out of africa as early black man those who went to colder regions found like more difficult. Since the environment was so muhc harsher example : its freezing in the north to survive u must utilized fire and hunt large animals that would rewuire tools and stratagy to obtain thier fur to built and design clothing those with higher intellegence would survive and replicate where as those with low would die. Therefore to live in warm africa runing down mice and other small animals could afford to be dumb but those in the north needed higher intellignece .

Not a Member!

Anonymous

Sunday 6th December 2009 | 02:43 PM

I feel bad for black people. They were released from slavery and given no education. It's not their fault they can't talk right.

Not a Member!

Blood42

Saturday 19th December 2009 | 06:03 PM

Alter Ego is obviously the only one on this page with any higher intellect whatsoever.Most of the rest of what I've read is just kneejerk,brainwashed,reactionary statements which have been pounded into you idiots through years of T.V.watching.
Learn to think for yourselves dorks,and live in the real world,not a propaganda fueled illusion.
Oh and to the black folk who responded with racist comments(Oh I forgot,black people cant be racist), fuck off stupid,and bow down.As long as dumbies like you exist,you will always be 3rd or 4th class.

The truth hurts.

Not a Member!

Blood42

Saturday 19th December 2009 | 06:05 PM

Dont hate me because I'm beautiful.Hate me because I'm right.

Not a Member!

Blood42

Saturday 19th December 2009 | 06:10 PM

Damn.I read a little more,and you black people really do seem to be racist.Thats ok dumby.Ya'll really are stupid,hahahaha.....I'm glad.
Bow down dumbies.

Not a Member!

Blood42

Saturday 19th December 2009 | 06:14 PM

Hey,you guys better ask the name of some intelligent"black people" to submit a comment,or you will be acused of being racist.
People like Jesse Jackson or that other one....whats his name??...ummm...hmmm...nevermind.

Not a Member!

Blood42

Saturday 19th December 2009 | 06:18 PM

I love being the most intelligent person on the planet,but hey,it's to be expected.....I'm a white male,hahahahahahahahhhhaaaaaaa......

Not a Member!

Blood42

Saturday 19th December 2009 | 06:26 PM

Damn Bob,You gotta point,but jeez....ever heard of run on sentences or punctuation??....jeez....my eyeballs started to bleed.

Not a Member!

Blood42

Saturday 19th December 2009 | 06:30 PM

Jake's a dumby,Jake's a dumby....

Not a Member!

Blood42

Saturday 19th December 2009 | 06:33 PM

Steven is ignorant also.Hidyhoe dumby.....hahahahahhhaaaa...

Not a Member!

Blood42

Saturday 19th December 2009 | 06:41 PM

Damn,you people really are stupid....all of you,black,white ,yellow or red.
After seeing the sentence structure and spelling,I'm not sure the human race has a chance at all.
I guess it's up to me to impregnate all of your wives and daughters,in order to save the human race,regardless of color.
It's all pink inside.
Send them my way dumbies.
Hahahahhhaaaaa...........

Papa

Papa

Saturday 19th December 2009 | 06:52 PM
98 total kudos

...in response to this comment by Blood42. What a drunk fundamentalists white dude posts after 2:52 my time...

I wish I had as much fun talking to myself...

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Papa

Papa

Saturday 19th December 2009 | 06:55 PM
98 total kudos

...in response to this comment by Papa. Oh, and lives in the deep south... I forgot to add that part.

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Jake Farr-Wharton

Jake Farr-Wharton

Saturday 19th December 2009 | 07:48 PM
202 total kudos

...in response to this comment by Blood42. I'd be interested to hear what qualifies one as a 'dumby' and 'ignorant' in your eyes. I only say that because you spent 10 odd comments telling people that they were dumb or ignorant without actually saying anything more, in my eyes, that would make you an ignorant dumby.

Peace out Sir Wankalot!

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Not a Member!

Kirk Cameron

Sunday 20th December 2009 | 01:12 AM

Hey Gilly! Jesus likes to suck the diseased, shitty cum out of the assholes of gay homeless men!

Not a Member!

Blood42

Tuesday 22nd December 2009 | 05:24 AM

No,I wasnt drunk,yes I'm white,no I'm not a fundamentalist,I dont live in the south(whats wrong with people who live in the south dumby) I was talking to idiots like you,it was nine comments,and there are many things which qualify someone as a moron and one of them is the inability to count to ten.

Not a Member!

Blood42

Tuesday 22nd December 2009 | 05:38 AM

Jake is such a smart little liberal,isn't he? I looked back,and only five of my comments mentioned morons,idiots or stupidity.
Shows you how much liberals care about the facts.
But people who live in reality, already knew liberals live in a dream world.

Live long and prosper(everyone except the dumbies,ya'll just contaminate the genetic pool)Ahhaaahhhhaaaa!!!!

Not a Member!

jaems

Tuesday 29th December 2009 | 01:33 PM

we all know its true... no one has had the balls to say it until now.

Trent Greguhn

Trent Greguhn

Wednesday 30th December 2009 | 05:43 AM
105 total kudos

...in response to this comment by jaems. This coming from a guy who can't spell his name correctly.

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Not a Member!

superior

Monday 11th January 2010 | 08:15 AM

Where did this professor conduct his reserch?im sure he just conducted it in US & Europe & said all blacks r less intelligent. He is biased & watever his reserch is based on is rubbish.Im sure its d other way round. He can go to hell 4 all i care.Very dumb nobel prize winner.baseless research..

Trent Greguhn

Trent Greguhn

Monday 11th January 2010 | 08:31 AM
105 total kudos

...in response to this comment by superior. Well Superior, your spelling and grammar is hard to comprehend, but are you saying that this man is wrong for what he said, but you think that black people are smarter than white people? How then, can you call him bias then?

Anyways, this claim is completely unfounded and I wouldn't doubt him doing it for the money. There is more gene variation between individuals (Like me and my friend) than groups (between blacks and whites), so saying this is ridiculous. There is no genetic pre-disposal for intelligence.

Think about it like this. If a nuclear war exterminated all humans but a small band of Australian Aborigines, a full 85 percent of the variability of Homo sapiens would be preserved.

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Not a Member!

turbo

Monday 22nd February 2010 | 07:22 PM

How many great African civilizations/scientists can you remember? Problems?

Jake Farr-Wharton

Jake Farr-Wharton

Tuesday 23rd February 2010 | 09:33 AM
202 total kudos

...in response to this comment by turbo. Considering that the earliest examples of writing comes from Africa, which was most assuredly the crucible of human civilisation, you would do well to check your facts. Problems?

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Not a Member!

vik

Saturday 27th February 2010 | 12:17 PM

everyone's going to be brown within the next few centuries haha, so all you white people savor your skin color while you still can...muahahahhahahah

Not a Member!

Ian

Sunday 28th February 2010 | 06:24 AM

I don't think that white people are necessarily smarter than so called black people. I think that some white people (red faced man) are born with a gene that makes them want to exalt themselves (like eagles). An innate characteristic that may never leave them. Most black people do not have this gene (unless an ancestor was raped by a white man (red faced man)), and hence this characteristic is not part of their psychological makeup. Black folks are usually more laid back. Most of them don't lust after power or supremacy.

Not a Member!

Harold

Tuesday 9th March 2010 | 07:38 PM

If he had conclude that 'blacks were smarter, faster, sexier, kinder' than whites, those same liberals would commemorate this "finding" and would give Watson a Nobel Prize and erect statues to him and his birthday would be a national and international holiday. And of course nobody would call him or his supporters 'racists', 'bigots', 'Hitlers', 'monsters'...

Not a Member!

louis

Thursday 1st April 2010 | 02:51 AM

...in response to this comment by Alter Ego. you are a pathetic fool , and you are going to face the creator of you very soon ignorant beast. how dare you open your mouth and concur with this useless old good for nothing man i hope you burn in hell.

Not a Member!

louis

Thursday 1st April 2010 | 02:54 AM

...in response to this comment by Blood42. as they say its all in the mind keep on wishing you were dude!

Not a Member!

louis

Thursday 1st April 2010 | 02:58 AM

...in response to this comment by Ian. that is exactly how life should be not being hungry for blood and power everyone should just accept each other for who they are and be happy.

Not a Member!

louis

Thursday 1st April 2010 | 03:05 AM

...in response to this comment by Harold. look dude! its only a wicked person and sadist that puts effort into trying to make other people unhappy and just so you know pretty soon the new findings will be that not all white people are truly white and equally intelligent take for example the blondes people actually believe that they are very dumb and slow naturally which is totally untrue, so ......

Not a Member!

louis

Thursday 1st April 2010 | 03:09 AM

...in response to this comment by vik. if you actually think about it every white person wants to be black you know all that tanning and trying to be what you are not thereby killing yourselves and you all say you are smart hahahahah! this is the worse form of dumbness

Not a Member!

louis

Thursday 1st April 2010 | 03:11 AM

...in response to this comment by Jake Farr-Wharton. way to go you are totally right good stuff!

Not a Member!

MO-BLACK

Wednesday 7th April 2010 | 12:00 AM

I FEEL THAT MOST PEOPLE WHO COMMENTED USED THEIR PERSONAL VIEWS INSTEAD OF SPEAKING FACTS. INTELLIGENCE IS A GENE WHICH CAN BE BORN WITH ANY PERSON OF ANY RACE. FACT: ANY PERSON WILL ADDAPT TO THE ENVIROMENT THEY ARE IN. FACT: SKIN COLOUR HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH A PERSON'S INTELLIGENCE. FACT: THE MORE YOU EXERCISE YOUR BRAIN POWER(READ) THE MORE INTELLIGENT YOU ARE. THOSE ARE THE BASIC FACTS LOVELY PEOPLE.

Not a Member!

Jurgens

Saturday 1st May 2010 | 09:36 PM

I am from South Africa and I am one of the few white people left. Please do excuse my spelling and grammar, this is not my first language. I am studying genetics at the university of Stellenbosch near Cape Town and we have done our own DNA testing. It is not said aloud but from all the samples we have, is is very clear that there is a difference in the genes working towards intelligence in whites and in black.

Black people just do not think the same. When the first white people came to the cape in 1652, there was nothing. The blacks here were still hunting with spears, wearing animal skin and staying in houses made of cow dung and grass. while at the same time the Europeans where much further in the sense of technology, medicine and having currency.

To this day what has the black man achieved without the help of a white man?
Look at the state of Africa after all the white people have been chased away.

Nigeria sells millions of dollars of oil each day, yet there are high numbers of crime starvation and diseases like aids.

In my own country the new black government has started with land transformation. Taking land from white farmers and give it to black. From the day it started in 1998, 87% has failed. Once productive land, supplying food and jobs are now only fields overgrown by weeds.

Go take a look how africa looks behinds it wildlife

Not a Member!

Henk V

Saturday 1st May 2010 | 09:57 PM

Jurgen, tell me when you get a promotion to give opinion. Clearly you haven't passed "uninfluenced point of view 101" yet. Its ok, we have a few...

Not a Member!

Gina

Sunday 2nd May 2010 | 12:05 PM

...in response to this comment by Jurgens. Nevermind Henk, Jurgen. He's an [insert adjective of your choice here].

Your spelling and grammar are fine. I believe you that white people and black don't think the same way, but just because some choose to live differently doesn't make them stupid, in my opinion. (Henk, please shut your trap.)

I was raised by a black woman and though she only had a third grade education, she was the wisest, kindest woman I've yet to come across in my 45 years. And I'm not exaggerating. Was she perfect? No. Did she need assistance reading the newspaper and magazines? Yes. Did she live like a pig? No. We, the white children in the house, were the pigs. She cleaned up after us. But on the other hand, I was raised near southeast D.C., and when they started busing the black kids into the white schools and vice versa, you would have thought all hell had broken loose. How come Priscilla, the woman who raised me and my other siblings, didn't act like a hellion? How could she have gone through the civil rights movement era and before then (she was born in 1907 or 1910 -- they apparently didn't think enough of black people in that day to bother to keep their birth records--so I've been told). I suppose maybe some people do act differently and it doesn't matter how much oil they have in their backyards, but it has nothing to do with race -- for proof of that all you have to do is look at the middle east. Heck, look at Wall Street.

Anyway. That's my two cents.

Henk, shut up.

Not a Member!

Henk V

Sunday 2nd May 2010 | 01:59 PM

Gina is a Jaapie?

Jurgen expressed his overpowering racism and regret at a government we in the west are all to comfortable with.

If we in the west are to do anything for Africa, its allowing representation.

so who fails
science
math
economy
political analysis

and who supports racist statements?

Next time read the damn post. What a crock of ot white shit it was. That includes an entirely different point of view to the rest of the worlds historians.

Not a Member!

Jurgens

Tuesday 4th May 2010 | 02:23 AM

Thanks Gina, and yes I understand what you are saying.

Apartheid was ended in 1992 and the new government took over in 1994. I am sorry to say that I am and I admit, I am a racist.

We have black people working in our home, and my dad has a small engineering business and employs a lot of black people.

But see it this way.

My mom are not entitled to a promotion because she is white. My dad has been hijacked twice. Our house was robbed 3 times. Two armed robberies in my street the last year. every 54 seconds a rape.
average 60 murders a day. From 1994 more than 3200 white farmers brutally murdered . burned by hot water and irons.

my old high school, was one of the best public schools in the western cape, in the last year more than 35 knife attacks and 3 armed with a fire arm.

Please go google crime in SA.

This is the kind of stuff that makes me a racist.

Maybe you will start looking at the picture from my point of view when you experience my situation.

once again, sorry Gina. I have a lot of black friends and our house is cleaned by black maids so I have a lot of respect.

One country in Africa that is a good example of good leadership? none.

And the people in the middle east are not white.
and then, sorry to say, can you give me a example of what the black man has achieved without the white man?

Not a Member!

Jurgens

Tuesday 4th May 2010 | 02:30 AM

Al wat die blanke Afrikaner wil hê is 'n veilige tuiste vir sy burgers waar hy sy christelike waardes op sy eie manier kan beoefen en hom self regeer.

Not a Member!

Gina

Tuesday 4th May 2010 | 11:11 AM

...in response to this comment by Jurgens. Hi Jurgen,

I understand why you say you are racist, but then you say you have a lot of back friends. So you're not really racist against black people, but against the harm they inflict -- big difference. Who wouldn't be? What they're doing is clearly wrong.

Apparently, from what I can tell, mid easterns are a mix of many different races. Just because one is labeled Caucasian doesn't necessarily mean that they have zero black blood any where in their ancestry. Come on.

Anyway, I don't want this to turn into a big thing. I realize you have many problems which lead you to feel the way you do, and I can't blame you!

I know that when the blacks were bussed into our neighborhoods they terrorized the white kids. (My gawd, it was bad enough that I was getting the stuffing kicked out of me by my 'intelligent' white father, and feeling raped emotionally and spiritually by those intelligent white men in the churches!)

I just don't think you're entirely right in believing that they are less intelligent because of the color of their race, or in thinking that they wouldn't have gotten anywhere without the help of the white man.

There is not ONE THING the white man has that wasn't given him. NOT ONE. St. Paul says EVERYTHING we have was given us, so there no one can boast. There is nothing we have that wasn't given us. The white man gave it to the black man? Well, that's nice, but the white man also TOOK a great many things from the black man himself ,and the Indians, etc.

If every single black person on the face of the earth behaved and lived the same as they are in Africa, THEN I could see painting them all with a broad brush. But they do not all behave that way.

They don't act that way toward the white people because they're less intelligent; they act that way toward the white people because they hate them. Again - big difference. Perhaps if the whites in South Africa were as advanced in their intelligence as you believe, they could find a way to get the blacks to behave? All I know is many do the same thing to their own people here and there! Blacks killing, robbing, raping other blacks. They are so filled with hate and lust.

The fact still remains there are intelligent black people who have made major contributions to the betterment of society.

And there are many evil and mean spirited white men who no conscience and have murdered more people than I think eve you would be embarrassed to admit. And, for proof of that all we have to do is look at Hitler, the Crusaders, the manufacturers of cigarettes, the pharmaceutical companies. Look at the Mafia. Look at Mao. Did I leave anyone out?

Anyway, Jurgen, though I disagree with you to a certain extent, I do feel for you. I'm so very sorry that you're family and friends and neighbors and country is in the dismal shape it's in.

I will pray for God's protection over you and your loved ones and neighbors.
Please stay around and let us know how you are fairing.
Gina

Not a Member!

Gina

Tuesday 4th May 2010 | 12:44 PM

Correction: *because of their race* and *faring*

And yes, I know Mao wasn't white.

Not a Member!

mrn

Friday 7th May 2010 | 12:02 PM

it's sad how society can just fucking accept the fact. even if its a little racist its true that most black people are not as smart and if you are not willing to accept you are a fucking retard.

Not a Member!

mrn

Friday 7th May 2010 | 12:02 PM

it's sad how society can just fucking accept the fact. even if its a little racist its true that most black people are not as smart and if you are not willing to accept you are a fucking retard.

coolio

coolio

Monday 21st June 2010 | 09:18 PM
No total kudos

what a bastard :/
this is quite sad - as a black person myself, i would say i'm pretty fucking clever and a lot cleverer than many many people. At the same time, other people, i'm sure, are cleverer than myself. It does not depend on race - intelligence is determined by motivation, family, upbringing, competition and environmental influences :)
although having said that, everyone is entitled to their own opinion...regardless of how racist and ludicrous they may be.

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
coolio

coolio

Monday 21st June 2010 | 09:19 PM
No total kudos

racist.

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Not a Member!

Gina

Tuesday 22nd June 2010 | 11:53 AM

...in response to this comment by mrn. Oh, my! That was absolutely BRILLIANT.

Not.

Not a Member!

ilirross

Saturday 3rd July 2010 | 09:23 AM

...in response to this comment by African prophet. look at how you talk first of all i would trade my melanin for vocabulary any day

Not a Member!

someone

Tuesday 13th July 2010 | 06:56 PM

Dem nigga's are dumber? Wat da hell!! Why are u bitches hatin on us just coz we're different race. Fuck u racist bitches

Not a Member!

snow ghost in the shadows

Saturday 7th August 2010 | 06:55 PM

Whatever!!!! There is nothing in any science arena that can prove someones skin color determines his or her intellect, intellect can be achieved by anyone who puts in the effort to learn. There smart people and there dumb people the dumb people just put in the effort, that's the only difference. I respect his work on DNA but this guy has proven that he is an old "whacko" go ahead and die already.

Not a Member!

snow ghost in the shadows

Saturday 7th August 2010 | 06:58 PM

Whatever!!!! There is nothing in any science arena that can prove someones skin color determines his or her intellect, intellect can be achieved by anyone who puts in the effort to learn. There smart people and there dumb people the smart people just put in the effort, that's the only difference. I respect his work on DNA but this guy has proven that he is an old "whacko" go ahead and die already.

correction to my last post.

Not a Member!

Scientist

Monday 16th August 2010 | 03:17 AM

He is a scientist and if he says he found evidence that people of a certain ethinicty are intellectually inferior, then its up to him to attempt to publish his findings. Until his work is published its just opinion and should be taken for a grain of salt. Whether or not his motivation was influenced by age old racist views is irrelevant if he can present his findings as fact. I don't really get some peoples comments. Theres no such thing as being less evolved because there is no goal of evolution. He didn't say skin colour determines intellect but that dna does (correlation does not imply causation). Calling a nobel prize winning scientist 'stupid' is just well ...stupid. Arguing from a religious point of view that God made us all equal is just delusional and should be kept away from science. Religion is the source of most racist view points to begin with and is one of the biggest reasons some nations are chaotic and underdeveloped, not intelligence.

Not a Member!

Yeaher

Monday 16th August 2010 | 10:37 AM

Look at Obama the horses ass
It’s amazing that Obama lacked the foresight to see that supporting the construction of a $100 million mosque 2 blocks from Ground Zero, something that 70% of Americans oppose, won’t end well.
Rham Emmanuel the communist, and Michelle Obama the millionaire’s wife, equating “religious freedom” with an Islamic cultural center whose purpose is to promote Sharia law is the kind of progressive garbage you get.

Under Sharia law, men are the judge, jury and executioners of women, and Obama apparently thinks Americans are too stupid to know this

Well if you voted for a dumb blackman and you are white woman Tee hee heh Bring on shariah law You deserve it

Not a Member!

laustcawz

Friday 10th September 2010 | 10:33 AM

...in response to this comment by Jake Farr-Wharton.
Black people, or African-Americans, or whatever they prefer to be called, have abundant advantages (educational & otherwise) in today's society, in the U.S. probably more than anywhere else. All sorts of grants, scholarships, & accommodations of every imaginable kind
are available. There's the NAACP, the United Negro College Fund still exists, &, of course, there's BET, to name just a few examples. There's an idea being spread called "Melanin Theory", the basic premise of which is that black people are more evolved than white people. One of the reasons given for this is spirituality, the implication of which is often religious belief (& I have no reason to believe that this isn't the case here). I'm white & I'm an atheist, &, with a couple of exceptions, all the other atheists I've ever known have been white as well, & it would seem to me that a more evolved person would be one who questions the continuing relevance of religion in such a modern, scientific age, not one who embraces it perhaps more tightly than ever (many black people seem to be among the most religiously obsessed). We continually are told (especially by black people) to celebrate Africa, but, from what I've read, it doesn't seem that slavery has been outlawed there. Can anyone confirm or deny this? If it's still happening there, is anyone inclined to try to do anything about it?

I sing, play three musical instruments & have composed numerous original songs, all without ever having taken singing lessons (they seemed entirely superfluous) & having used no more instruction than:
1. A couple of piano lessons (there was only so much I could take of practicing "Shoo-Fly").
2. The thing that really saved me, a cheapo mail-order book on playing the piano by ear that probably didn't cost much more than a couple of bucks (I don't remember exactly).
3. Studying one page of a guitar book, showing which strings/frets corresponded to which keys & the rest was just practice (& my brother taking 30 seconds to show me how to do bar chords), &
4. Learning the tuning of ukulele strings to figure out how to play that.

If I had more money, more space, & more privacy, who knows how many instruments I'd be able to play by now?

I worked snippets of my songs into a 15-min.doc. film (about me, about how I was almost killed a few years ago & am convinced my family was responsible, though I can't prove it, & about the undervaluing of individuality) that I created in filmmaking classes that I took at a school for which I got loans that I may never be able to pay back, that has now closed permanently (& I think I'm still the only student who hasn't had the chance to graduate), & at which I'd estimate that 90% of the students were blacks/African-Americans, which I never expected to be a problem, but many of them saw fit to use me as a scapegoat for slavery, segregation & other such grievances, including a couple of teachers, & I've no doubt that they're all doing perfectly fine now.

For my documentary, I served as my entire crew & on-screen presence, edited, copied & packaged the whole thing myself, using the school's facilities before it closed, independently sold numerous copies of it, & even had it shown in NYC at an independent theater that, like my school, is also now closed. If I were anything other than a white male, perhaps the theater would be treated as a landmark. As it is, it's been turned into a laundromat.

I find that there's a dearth of blacks/African-Americans who truly value intelligence for its own sake. I hate snobbery, which I've frequently encountered with certain breeds of white people, but I also think it's pathetic that the so-called "limitations" of blacks/African-Americans are always being blamed on "whites". I think there's an intense reluctance on the part of some blacks/A.-A.s to be or to try or to seem intelligent/intellectual at all, 'cause this supposedly means they've "sold out" & become too "white". However much or however little genes or evolution have to do with it, I think the majority of blacks/A.-A.s have been conditioned (in whatever manner, in whatever capacity, for whatever reasons) to concentrate almost exclusively on their skin color/race/ethnicity or whatever, at the expense of everything else, including intelligence. Having tried college (I really would've preferred on-the-job training & might've gotten it if I were black), I can't say I really think much more of it than high school (which I really did not enjoy much), except for topically relevant computer facilities & maybe a few truly intellectual instructors, & that, in my case, it must be on a par with the school experiences of the members of the punk rock group, Minor Threat.

Even keeping in mind that there are different types of intelligence (for example, book smarts vs. street smarts), maybe, ultimately, the smartest people are the ones who value intelligence the most highly.

If you want, you can check out the websites I created (which I alone designed) in my filmmaking classes, while they still exist. Don't know if I'll ever be able to make any further updates to them, though, since the computer programs were only available to me at the school. www.laustcawz.biz www.unpopculture.freehostia.com

Not a Member!

certsy sanders

Sunday 21st November 2010 | 07:02 AM

coolio about summed it up. you see it all in corporate culture. seemingly intelligent capable black, white, mexican, cuban, puerto rican and a broad array of blends and mixtures thereof , our collective problem is divisive government policy that seems more and more foreign and hostile to citizenry.

Henk V

Henk V

Sunday 21st November 2010 | 09:25 AM
7 total kudos

...in response to this comment by laustcawz. profundity, the inability to research presentation media yet claim to be an artist.


It used to be lumped in with irony but the special needs folk took exception.


There is an international charity that you can all donate to;

"Artistes sans Ecole"

I know it appears the paypal is very similar to mine but cynicism doesn't mean irony guys.

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Friendo

Friendo

Monday 22nd November 2010 | 05:18 AM
119 total kudos

Alter Ego, Ay, NC, lea, Jaco, Marie Ellena Jacobs, African prophet, BBC, GodsHand, snake the midgets, August, michael jackson, the A, Its Spiderman, Duh, vanikaapaf, dobbo996, Cactus, cambo, The-Libertarian, V2, "lightskin" Black, explor, Blood42, jaems, superior, turbo, vik, Ian, Harold, louis, Jurgens, mrn, coolio, ilirross, someone, snow ghost in the shadows, Scientist, Yeaher, laustcawz, certsy sanders, , Peter Fennelsdorf, jerome, donny ike, josh, a proud beautiful white woman

Wow, this is a collection of names like I have never seen in over tow years with RL. I wonder what is being said here. Me thinks the same person is commenting, using different names to skew the statistics. Only Mikey can tell for sure, by looking at the I.P.'s.

Over 110 comments though, pretty good. I think somebody is pretty pissed off, or perhaps a couple of people. I am so impressed with this outpour of comments, I am thinking of writing a racial slam that I don't believe in, just to see how many wako comments I can get. Perhaps if I pretend to be some racist that I'm not, or perhaps just post some blatant racist article I find on the net, I can hit the stars like this one did.

f~

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Henk V

Henk V

Monday 22nd November 2010 | 07:20 AM
7 total kudos

I assumed they were randoms.. one off comments.


I was pretty unimpressed with the racial slur issue and the fact that somebody just let it glide by.

I have to admit, I may have over reacted but am far too lazy to hunt around old comments. The Henk V of last week may be passe, the Henk V of last month is probably forgotten and It would be remiss of me not to point out that the Henk V of a few months ago may just be a little bit boring.

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Friendo

Friendo

Monday 22nd November 2010 | 08:08 AM
119 total kudos

...in response to this comment by Henk V. Well then..it's off to the next politically incorrect, factually wrong, intolerant, stupid, shocking, narrow minded article. I think I could come up with something pretty good.

The Friendo of yesterday was perhaps woefully ignorant, but the Friendo of today is brilliantly uninformed, and tomorrow...well god, er whatever!. Off to the races.

f~

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Henk V

Henk V

Monday 22nd November 2010 | 05:20 PM
7 total kudos

so trifecta's are coming back I take it..

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Not a Member!

Dave

Saturday 18th December 2010 | 02:55 AM

So it's okay for blacks to claim their physically stronger on websites on the net without actual reference but a white person can't claim their race is more intelligent on the net WITH scientific reference without being called racist xenophobic bigots.

Not a Member!

Politically Incorrect

Tuesday 22nd February 2011 | 10:42 PM

He is right .............

Not a Member!

Henk V.

Wednesday 23rd February 2011 | 03:47 PM

...in response to this comment by Dave. no, because they'd just be...wrong

Not a Member!

Mike

Friday 4th March 2011 | 10:54 AM

...in response to this comment by Jake. That was a politicly correct denigration of Dr. Watson, but anyone can make just casual observations of a race as a whole and come to his same conclusions !

Not a Member!

CasonDion C.

Friday 4th March 2011 | 05:16 PM

Objective or subjective reason? " Non-Hispanic white" individuals, according to the Census, will soon be the minority in the United States. Scholarships for this brand new minority are already being offered. The Former Majority Association for Equality gathered together a nonprofit status past year to address this need. The scholarship is offered for a relatively large subset of individuals. A 3.0 GPA and one-quarter Caucasian lineage is needed.


Not a Member!

Henk V.

Saturday 5th March 2011 | 11:22 AM

...in response to this comment by CasonDion C.. There wouldnt be discrimination between creationists and the rest of the population then..

like really A GPA of 3.0 is a mountain for creationists

Not a Member!

Black Ant

Sunday 13th March 2011 | 01:51 AM

Black Ants and White Ants. White Ant makes black ant work - White ant has to be quick witted and always stay one up!

Not a Member!

Open Minded..

Friday 1st April 2011 | 05:20 PM

Lets forget for a minute that this statement came from a scientist who won a Nobel Prize for his discoveries in genetics... Saying that black people [on average] are less intelligent than white people doesn't have anything to do with the presence or lack of melanin, but how the ancestors of said people with melanin evolved. Genetics, much like skin color, are passed from one person to the next through the blood-line. Though knowledge is something that one acquires through reading and studying, it is a fact that certain individuals are more intelligent than others. If everyone were automatically created equal they wouldn't give Intelligence Quotient tests.
White people throughout the course of history have had a better track record for being great thinkers. The oldest piece of art work ever found was discovered in Germany; not to mention all the great prehistoric cave paintings that have been discovered all over Europe. Great artistic minds throughout history, all predominately white (Leonardo, Picasso, Van Gogh, Michelangelo, Donatello, Andy Warhol, Ansel Adams, etc...not saying some black people aren't great artist too). Great musicians/composers leading up to the 20th century era of music were predominantly white. Bach, Mozart, Beethoven: say no more. Pretty much every great invention that makes the world what it is today was invented by white people; like ELECTRICITY, the light bulb, internal combustion engine, the automobile...
Look at all the countries where black people originate from (not to be confused with middle-eastern people), they're typically under developed and poor; ironically, they're completely saturated with valuable natural resources. However, countries where white people are native have always flourished (I know that having suitable soil for farming helped the advancement of ancient white civilizations, but Africa is full of DIAMONDS and OIL and they're still a poor country).
I feel that the argument used above, that white people living to the north had to rely on intellect to survive is a good explanation for everything I have just said. The less intelligent were eliminated from the gene pool. It only makes sense that Africans were forced to adapt to their environment as well, making them become fast, agile, and athletic in order to hunt animals (which translates to their over-whelming domination of pro sports).
Go ahead call me a racist, and I know that people will, but you know that everything I just said makes sense.

Not a Member!

Henk v

Sunday 3rd April 2011 | 02:12 PM

Quote Lets forget for a minute that this statement came from a scientist who won a Nobel Prize for his discoveries in genetics... Saying that black people [on average] are less intelligent than white people doesn't have anything to do with the presence or lack of melanin, but how the ancestors of said people with melanin evolved. Genetics, much like skin color, are passed from one person to the next through the blood-line. Though knowledge is something that one acquires through reading and studying, it is a fact that certain individuals are more intelligent than others. If everyone were automatically created equal they wouldn't give Intelligence Quotient tests. endquote

a) yes I will not forget that he is suffering the nobel syndrome
b) lets face it, you know very little about 40's genetics let alone 70's genetics
c) if youve noticed, intelligence quotient tests only exist in "name" to study dynamics. Everyone is equal to the mean except for astounding individuals like..gilly.

Quote White people throughout the course of history have had a better track record for being great thinkers. The oldest piece of art work ever found was discovered in Germany; not to mention all the great prehistoric cave paintings that have been discovered all over Europe. Great artistic minds throughout history, all predominately white (Leonardo, Picasso, Van Gogh, Michelangelo, Donatello, Andy Warhol, Ansel Adams, etc...not saying some black people aren't great artist too). Great musicians/composers leading up to the 20th century era of music were predominantly white. Bach, Mozart, Beethoven: say no more. Pretty much every great invention that makes the world what it is today was invented by white people; like ELECTRICITY, the light bulb, internal combustion engine, the automobile...

a) the oldest piece of art is not associated with germanic genes... thats a fucking huge OOPS
b) van Gogh wasnt a turtle (you are).. this says nothing as I considr most art to be simplistic unless emotion is brought tofore... If you are talking unique art, why dindt you include rembrant and velasquez.. These niggers had it all over you whiteys!

If art is an expression of intelligence then musical instruments found from 170kABp has it that us niggers have Jive!

c) white people invented electricity? come on? there was no electricity before you just mentioned that? Look, I am Frisio, Dutch, germanic and My people gave you this ridiculous language. Us white niggers from the north recognise that africa is our mother.. I dunno if orangutans or gibbons are your fucking mother stock, but I rather exclude myself from you guys and hang with my african brethren (yes i know, I actually think I might be a bonobo, but i know you are a racist tool).

Quote Look at all the countries where black people originate from (not to be confused with middle-eastern people), they're typically under developed and poor; ironically, they're completely saturated with valuable natural resources. However, countries where white people are native have always flourished (I know that having suitable soil for farming helped the advancement of ancient white civilizations, but Africa is full of DIAMONDS and OIL and they're still a poor country).
I feel that the argument used above, that white people living to the north had to rely on intellect to survive is a good explanation for everything I have just said. The less intelligent were eliminated from the gene pool. It only makes sense that Africans were forced to adapt to their environment as well, making them become fast, agile, and athletic in order to hunt animals (which translates to their over-whelming domination of pro sports).
Go ahead call me a racist, and I know that people will, but you know that everything I just said makes sense. end quote

a) amasingly this shows that you have read KKK press
b) Uplift comes from education and whilst fuckheads like you think that africa is a sex tourism destination well worthy of patronising, we will never solve and prosecute the criminals that usurp every stream of good will, Please, why dont you become an evangelist and fuck them over a bit more?



Fuck heads like you make me sick..

Not a Member!

Jerome

Thursday 28th April 2011 | 11:30 AM

Look at the world, Look at the history, Look at crime statistics, Look at IQ statistic. Coinsidence?

Why is it fair to say that African in general are better runners than whites but it's racist to say that whites are more intelligent? Is it so unbelievable that we evolved differently depending on our geographical location? Even Darwin did not consider us mentally equal.

Not a Member!

loky

Monday 23rd May 2011 | 03:55 AM

...in response to this comment by Gilly. Gilly wrote:
"It was the fundamental/evangelical Christians, Jake, who ended slavery. All men are created equal..."

It was also fundamental/evangelical Christians that initiated the slave trade in the first place; traded the negro as a simple commodity and considered them 3/5 of a person. To these early Christian Americans the negro was regarded to be farm equipment, no more, no less. They did believe all men to be created equal, they just clearly did not consider the negro to be a man, i.e. human.

Gina

Gina

Monday 23rd May 2011 | 10:15 AM
14 total kudos

...in response to this comment by loky. "They did believe all men to be created equal, they just clearly did not consider the negro to be a man, i.e. human. "

Clearly. Although, I think choice of the word "negro" seems rather suspicious. Hmmm.

And, may I say, I have mixed (perhaps extremely selfish, if I say so myself) feelings about your comment and others regarding slavery/slavetrade. I mean, had they [whoever "they" is] not considered the black man subhuman [albeit wrongly], I might have never met some of the coolest people; I mean, I think of the woman who raised me (See my comments above) and I think, wow, what kind of person I might be had she not been there? I have quite a few good childhood memories because of her.

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Gina

Gina

Monday 23rd May 2011 | 10:19 AM
14 total kudos

...in response to this comment by Gina. p.s. Friendo, Loved, loved, loved, loved the top comment on the video "Alma." I was not expecting the ending - cool story and very good graphics and direction (IMVHO).

p.p.s. I just commented off topic.

:D

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Not a Member!

Mud

Monday 23rd May 2011 | 01:53 PM

Oh the christians started the slave trade? New one on me..

Not a Member!

Galecto

Friday 27th May 2011 | 09:59 PM

I think it is true, because I never see a black scientist yet.

Gina

Gina

Friday 27th May 2011 | 11:19 PM
14 total kudos

...in response to this comment by Galecto . Try putting the black man depicted in the HBO movie, "Something the Lord Made," which is based on a true story, in the category of scientists. That might help you see a little more clearly. :)

Give Kudos | Reply | Comment URL | Profile | Top
Not a Member!

Louis

Thursday 16th June 2011 | 03:00 PM

Quote directly from Wikipedia:

"Historians agree that between 11 and 18 million Africans were enslaved by Arab slave traders and taken across the Red Sea, Indian Ocean, and Sahara desert between 650 and 1900,[4][5][6] compared to 9.4 to 14 million Africans brought to the Americas in the Atlantic slave trade[7] from 15th century to the early 19th century".

Don't believe everything that you hear in School's or in the media. The fact is that Caucasian's enslaved a fraction of the Africans that the Arabs did and we also only did it for around 400 years, as opposed to ~1250 years.

Anyone who claims that 'The Christians' started the slave trade is ignorant, at best.

Does pointing out this FACT make me racist? Funny how this type of thing is never widely reported.... I guess reality takes a backseat to political correctness these days...

Not a Member!

Muddie

Sunday 3rd July 2011 | 05:00 PM

Dammit, if you haven't seen a black scientist you probably see too many naturopaths and watch way too much commercial TV. You probably are within the "dumb masses".

Christians cannot have started slavery as it was a perfectly good way of getting labour before folk started getting a conscience on the issue. Who ever tells one otherwise is plainly ignorant. You may note that slave labour was around before semites even started figuring in history. So you can rule out "arabs" having started it. Yes another dumb insinuation made above.

I am sorry to have to declare that slavery was around before there was a way to recompense a person for their travails. That is so far before any of the monotheistic gods and their brief religions that you could say; Slavery is the norm, religion is the exception.

Come to think of it, slavery kills the "objective moral" argument previously lost elsewhere on R.L. by religious apologists.

Even the current Dalai Llama has stinky slavery fingerprints in his book of life. I can see no distinction.

It appears the article this all drags from and the promotion of bigotry displayed by a long term RL member may have been totally unnecessay. The originating article is a misrepresentation. Pity really.

Still its good to trap those who don't read much and comment a lot.

Not a Member!

spmckendrick

Friday 5th August 2011 | 07:16 AM

Gentically the article bares some truth

FACT : white/asians have a higher brain mass than African ethnic groups, it seems the darker skinned the person the lower your brain mass...

::this is the reason why white poeple and asians have rather larger forheads rhan other races..

brain mass doesnt contribute much towards intelligence but rather how this is stored (storage)
since we only use >10% of i brains, the rest is unused and is unecessary / atleast at the moment /- who knows in the future we might occupy more and thereby proving the article above as factual.

IQ levels at the moment, remain highest within lighter skinned ethinic groups however we can forget that these groups are highly previledged thereby could this be the cause..?

Souces : Asian male / GENETIC BIOLOGIST, IQ = 148

Not a Member!

MSNX

Friday 5th August 2011 | 07:24 AM

As a geneticist myself i can hereby validate what SPMCKENDRICK has stated.

There are benfits to each race

Blacks/Africans(dark skinned individuals) have physical attributes which surpass other groups.

they have more fine mortor muscles which makes accelerate at sports (as seen today) such as athletics, basketball.., boxing etc (fast paced sports)

whites(light skinned individuals/ethnic races) have the contrary have more large motor muscles therby they able to grow bigger muscles which is why lighter skinned poeple (as seen today) accerlerate and predominatley own varios strength sports... sucj as body building

celts, spartans etc... were/are considered to be the fierciest warriors throught history..

Not a Member!

tony

Friday 5th August 2011 | 07:29 AM

How niave should the above state "there is nothing in science which can state blacks are less intelligent"

as the above gentlemen have proved there is a diffrence

is there not a reason why technological advances by asians and europeans have surpassed other races..

if evolution is correct there only by common sense should we annomalate that asians and whites have genetically evolved..

@dave - so true, i agree with u mate 1000%

Not a Member!

CYRUS

Friday 5th August 2011 | 07:45 AM

IM FRENCH SO MIND MY ENGLISH

we are genetically diffrent [FACT]

can you not realise that being diffrent in color has some hint that we ARE diffrent, we are not the same...

each race has its benefits and disadvantages [HYPOTHESUS]

this is kept as a hush to prevent racial hatred [THEORY]

wants youve studied animals and evolution.. you'll understand WHY this is so...

you hereby know that one set of elephants in asia are browner in colour, bigger in size, and that not only do the physical attributes change but also the mental prowess... than others in africa.. [EVOLUTION]

YET THERE ARE THE SAME SPECIES [BOTH ELEPHANTS]

climate is a big reason for evolution but so is cell memory

its been recently discovered that all cells not just brain cells hold Memory..
memory being held in cells modifies the dna structure therbey evolving the species...

THIS IS FACT::
if your forefarthers were all scientist(s) or doctors [in other word(s) exercised the mind, the brain] you will be born with a higher IQ than if your forefarthers were miners..or so relevant

I CAN ONLY HOPE THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE GENERATION STUDY EVOLUTION FOR FURTHER PROOF..

And not question without research
i am not racist at all, its hard to mantain a nueturality when discussing SUCH A SENSITIVE mater to the inflicted

most will contimue to deny the truth which in no bothers myself

i consider myself a humanatarian and treasure all races as there each are RICH in culture and have the benefits for Society



Not a Member!

~ ASIANO

Friday 5th August 2011 | 08:02 AM

we are all diffent i can relate to what everyone has said.

we are diffrent **** lets face it

benefits of being black/africans [FACTS]
-- higher resistance to spf sunlight (less likley to get skin cancer)
-- have more fine motor muscles as stated above
-- muscles show more because we dark skinned
-- hey! we good at "fast paced" sports
-- higher deversity therfore we have a higher resitsance to some diseases

benefits of being white/asians/europeans [FACTS]
-- they have larger motor muscles and have more , therfor there excell at body building, swimming etc...
-- higher brain mass, ( which in some degree contributes to intelligence )
-- they are better suited to cold areas and thrive on cold conditions because they have little spf resistance thereby accepting all vitamin d etc..

Hey this seems to EVEN OUT TO ME
theres no saying that a black man cant become a doctor its just going to be harder
theres no saying a white guy cant excell at athletics its just going to be harder

we are born diffrent but we all die the same after this earth when we pass to the next, we'll have our mind to guide us

for what matters now means little then
for what we are now can change by then
for what we are then we now little of now
statuary by a dear white friend "Shawn Schrieber"

Not a Member!

Saturday 6th August 2011 | 11:04 AM

Regardless of a person's personal reasons for agreeing or disagreeing with what Watson said, read what Wikipedia has to say about Mr. Watson (as posted under "Controversies"):


Begin quote:

Watson has often expressed provocative concepts and disapproving opinion of others seemingly within the realm of genetic research.

* Watson has repeatedly supported genetic screening and genetic engineering in public lectures and interviews, arguing that stupidity is a disease and the "really stupid" bottom 10% of people should be cured.
He has also suggested that beauty could be genetically engineered, saying "People say it would be terrible if we made all girls pretty. I think it would be great."[47]

* He has been quoted in The Sunday Telegraph as stating: "If you could find the gene which determines sexuality and a woman decides she doesn't want a homosexual child, well, let her."[48] The biologist Richard Dawkins wrote a letter to The Independent claiming that Watson's position was misrepresented by The Sunday Telegraph article, and that Watson would equally consider the possibility of having a heterosexual child to be just as valid as any other reason for abortion, to emphasise that Watson is in favor of allowing choice.[49]

* On the issue of obesity, Watson has also been quoted as saying: "Whenever you interview fat people, you feel bad, because you know you're not going to hire them."[50]

* Watson also had quite a few disagreements with Craig Venter regarding his use of EST fragments while Venter worked at NIH. Venter went on to found Celera genomics and continued his feud with Watson. Watson was even quoted as calling Venter "Hitler".[51]

* While speaking at a conference in 2000, Watson had suggested a link between skin color and sex drive, hypothesizing that dark-skinned people have stronger libidos.[50][52] His lecture, complete with slides of bikini-clad women, argued that extracts of melanin – which gives skin its color – had been found to boost subjects' sex drive. "That's why you have Latin lovers," he said, according to people who attended the lecture. "You've never heard of an English lover. Only an English patient."

* On October 25, 2007, Watson was compelled to retire as chancellor of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on New York's Long Island and from its board of directors, after Watson had been quoted in The Times the previous week as saying "[I am] inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa [because] all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours—whereas all the testing says not really."

End quote.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_D._Watson#Early_life_and_education

Intelligence, insmelligence. The man's controversial. He'll make your heart race a little--that's for sure, but how intelligent he is at this point in the history of the universe remains to be seen by yours truly. I love this comment:

* On October 25, 2007, Watson was compelled to retire as chancellor of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on New York's Long Island and from its board of directors, after Watson had been quoted in The Times the previous week as saying "[I am] inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa [because] all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours—whereas all the testing says not really."

End comment.

Notice what he doesn't say. He doesn't say, "all our MILITARY policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours.." Did ya notice that?

Not a Member!

Gina

Saturday 6th August 2011 | 11:05 AM

...in response to this comment by . Oops. That was my comment.

Not a Member!

Muddie

Sunday 7th August 2011 | 03:32 PM

Watson looks crook because he is a laureate making dumb statements..This sort of thing happens all the time.

but if you compare this to

Gina
Sunday 2nd May 2010 | 12:05 PM

on the subject, then you realise, stupid statements can come from everywhere. Its the KKKGina that worried me here.

Not Watson suffering Nobel disease. Watson should know better but the guy is pretty old.

Not a Member!

ken

Wednesday 28th September 2011 | 10:49 AM

...in response to this comment by Jake. Your not going to say that when you can't find a job cause stupid people have turned your white country into anouther third world, and whites are less than 1/10th the population in their own country.

Not a Member!

Ashia

Thursday 6th October 2011 | 09:50 AM

I would actually like to see the proof. He says he has found evidence...where in heaven's name is it?? And this argument can EASILY be disputed...I am only 16 but I am smart enough to know that Europeans came to AFRICA..yea..where BLACK people were originally from and stole a lot of knowledge from US. For example, the Pythagreon Theorem is not really founded by Pythagreon, it was founded by IMHOTEP...a black man....and Aristotle also studied in Africa. Do you think he did not get any of his skills or ideas from the BLACKS who inhabitated this area? Very unlikey...these are the things text books don't tell you...and even though I'm DUMB and BLACK I'm smart enough to research this and dispute this so-called "scientist" at the age of 16 when he cannot even back up his claims...interesting.

Not a Member!

Eduard

Saturday 22nd October 2011 | 11:07 PM

All the world knows that blacks are less intelligent on the planet, generally speaking, although there are many people trying this is not cause for mistreatment of blacks. Everyone should have equal rights and equal opportunities, but I feel that the truth offends times, but why should we close our eyes to this reality, we must take it into account to optimize certain policies, for example, truth is always a help if we do not take things so seriously.

Not a Member!

Visitor

Tuesday 25th October 2011 | 12:19 PM

...in response to this comment by BBC. I just want to point out couple of things. There is no proven evidence that Egyptians were of the Negro ancestry, just as there is no proof that they were of a more fair skinned origin. According to some of the more recent facts Egyptians as a race assimilated and eventually ceased to exist, therefore their skin color, appearance, and other traits are highly debatable.

Furthermore, I am not American, and as an outsider I think that the constant concentration on racism and the fear to appear racist is the major problem in this country. The best way to deal with racism is to create completely equal environment. Eliminate race, skin color quote on all legal documents, eliminate affirmative action (because this seems more like a racism against whites), and eliminate different class levels in high schools. I always have a feeling that white people in USA feel like they need to atone for the past (slavery and such). Well this is ridiculous, history is history. Slavery was unfortunate, but required at the time. And let be honest black people were not the only slaves in the world. What about serfs in Russia, or Chinese slaves in Japan? History is history, learn from it and move on. People of African origin got their freedom here in US, so what are all the talks about.

As far as Dr. Watson's data, he was not the first person to present it. And I think that the main point is that from evolutionary perspective people of Negro descent are behind those of Caucasian origins. But then again, there is also thousands of data available that states that Caucasians are behind people of middle Asia.

Not a Member!

Visitor

Tuesday 25th October 2011 | 12:26 PM

I am sorry, but you list the websites where you got this information? I am actually very intersted to find out, mostly I want to make sure that it is a peer reviewed data.

I am not sure about Dr. Watson's data, but here is a link to a very intersting (peer reviewed) article: http://www.charlesdarwinresearch.org/TaxonomicConstruct.pdf.

Add a comment

Login to Rusty Lime

Not registered? | Forgot your Password? Cancel Login