Photo Sites Must Adequately Inform Copyright Usage
Phil Stol 5 comments
With the exponential growth of photo sites like flickr, zooomr, and stock.xchng, there is a real need to raise the awareness of copyright laws and infringements. I ran across this photo on flickr entitled "Never Mind Your Copyright" (which I'm using appropriately under the Creative Commons some rights reserved). He writes a rant about this issue entitled "Freedom of expression?? Telling the truth??"on his blog. Copyright issues are becoming a very hot topic and will gain more and more press over the next few years. The photographer generated this image as a statement back to flickr about issues related to his photos being used in-appropriately.
Another related story reported by the Sydney Morning Herald states that a Texas family is taking Virgin Mobile phone company to court over their use of the girls image taken from a photo posted on flickr. While the photographer released the image under a sharing license, the company neglected to get a release from the family to use the image. This of course is a major no no.
It is easy to point fingers at large companies like Virgin Mobile and say shame, shame, for not following due process to get a release and offer some compensation to the model and most probably the photographer. In the case of the many other copyright infringements by bloggers who inappropriately re-use flickr and other photo sites, I believe these photo sites share culpability with the bloggers. There is more the photo sites could do to protect the photographers and to inform the users of the sites.
Some suggestions for photo sites to better inform users
- Post copyright guidelines more prominently on their site. If they are following the Creative Commons standards, they should re-state or link-out to those guidelines.
- Make the statements for use of a specific photo more obvious. This should not be considered the fine print, but rather a prominently placed tag next to the photo and download button. Of all the sites I've seen stock.xchng seems to do this the best.
- Raise the awareness through a media campaign. This would instill confidence in users that they would be in less danger of infringement.
- Provide usage examples to follow. More than stating the guidelines, educating users with visual use examples will help them properly cite borrowed media.
Most users are eager to follow the law and respect creative works. If media sites raise the level of awareness; the creators of the works, those re-using the works and the photo sites all win in the end.
Damon
Tuesday 25th September 2007 | 07:59 PMEXIF info is removed as soon as the image is saved to another format or optimised, but I like your thinking. It's not a preventative measure though.
Yes, there are a number of additional steps one could take, but I believe user education has to take precedence. The major sites do a dis-service to the online community when they stay quiet on this issue.
Kluger
Tuesday 2nd October 2007 | 07:20 PMI am always amazed to read about photographers complaining of their online work being used in a way they didn't want when they could have easily taken a few simple steps to prevent or at least minimise the possibility. I am even more amazed that some of my photographer friends who post their work online haven't even heard of Creative Commons.
FroughDough
Wednesday 24th October 2007 | 12:28 AMHey thanks for writing this. Confirms most things I knew but Creative Commons never occurred to me.
Jonno
Tuesday 25th September 2007 | 05:40 PMSage advice. What about making sure your EXIF data is correct. Just in case you come a cross some idiot selling CD's with your images but he wasn't smart enough to check the EXIF data.